Missed a K?
Indeed ... thanks.
The unsettling thing is that you keep wondering where her hands have been to create this stark colour difference.
You think?
I mean, sure, when I look at it more closely ... especially the left arm ... yeah, it's a bit odd ... but that's vulpine colouration (to be expected really).
I dunno ... I can't put my finger on it; it's just a bit too good ... a bit too realistic ...not a turn-on in any way.
And I'm not sure I've ever not been at least mildly aroused by the female form before — even when.presented as some dreadful anime/furry/Disney hybrid monstrosity, I'll eye it up and down to see if, on balance, I wouldn't still after all, you know ¹.
Also … now I look more closely … although I’d already noted that the face is oddly masculine (but, otoh, what would I know about the masculinity/femininity of foxes, so, whatever) … ‘she’ has weirdly big hands. And I know the shoulders are ‘puffed’, but, nevertheless, they seem a bit broad to me.
Maybe that’s it … maybe it’s the masculinity rather than the animal that is niggling at me subconsciously … a sense of “one of these things is not like the other” that I wouldn’t even get from an exaggeratedly anthropomorphised female ‘sexy animal’ — maybe it’s just that I’m not into manimals, if you see what I mean.
—
¹
And I’d at least think about not kicking the one on the left out of bed; after all, she’s a she, she’s humanoid/anthropomorphic, probably got the right bits, has that ‘sexy-librarian/teacher’ thing going for her (very Witches of Eastwick) … and any hole’s a goal, right — so, I’ve gotta give her the once-over at least, before deciding there’s no way (you know how it is).
