Coincidence.

I just happen to have titled the piece that way when I wrote it.

Because I’m a smartarse who loves to play with language and ideas.

And, if at all possible, disturb people when I do so 😀

It was just appropriate to link out to it after my reply — which, admittedly only included that mention because, serendipitously, I realised I could … if I explicitly mentioned not even needing a five-year-old in order to see through someone on this occasion¹.

—
¹ So, I did ².

² Hopefully, you found the idea of my keeping a five-year-old in the cupboard-under-the-stairs disturbed 😀